University of Texas (also known as Fisher II). The court last upheld affirmative action in admission decisions in 2016, in Fisher v. You’re more likely to be viewed as less academic, as having less academic potential.” “You are more likely to be taught by teachers who are not as qualified as others. “If you’re Black, you’re more likely to be in an under-resourced school,” Justice Sonia Sotomayor said. The court’s three liberal-leaning justices appeared to defend race-based admissions. Photo by David Butow / Corbis via Getty Images ![]() Students protest in favor of affirmative action outside a meeting of the University of California's Board of Regents in November 1997. “When does it end when is your sunset?” Justice Amy Coney Barrett asked. In oral arguments, the court’s conservative majority asked how diversity is defined, what value it provides and how long affirmative action will be necessary. Decisions on the related cases will likely be delivered in June of next year. Court watchers are predicting that the justices will rule in SFFA’s favor, overturning decades of affirmative action at colleges across the United States. ![]() Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA), an anti-affirmative action group, is behind both cases, which oppose policies at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The Supreme Court’s stance on affirmative action ![]() This week, the phrase is in the news because the Supreme Court is hearing arguments in two new cases that could transform the future of race-based admissions. For contemporary observers, it might come as a surprise to learn that the origins of the term “ affirmative action”-a phrase loaded with meaning in today’s political landscape-are somewhat of a mystery.īroadly speaking, affirmative action refers to policies and practices designed to increase opportunities for historically underrepresented groups.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |